Fellows v. Ripley

45 A. 138, 69 N.H. 410
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 45 A. 138 (Fellows v. Ripley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fellows v. Ripley, 45 A. 138, 69 N.H. 410 (N.H. 1898).

Opinion

Wallace, J.

Richard Fellows negotiated the purchase of the land, paid the consideration, and took the deed in his wife’s name, under circumstances which show it was not a gift to or settlement upon her, but created a use in his favor. The plaintiffs claim title to the premises as the heirs of the wife, and the defendants under a-deed of Richard to them.

Under the statute of uses (27 Hen. VHI, c. 10), which is in force in this state, Richard, who was the cestui que use, became the legal owner of the land. The statute of uses executes the use, and vests the legal estate in the cestui que use. Hutchins v. Heywood, 50 N. H. 491. Richard’s title passed by his deed to the defendants. Osgood v. Eaton, 62 N. H. 512.

Decree for the defendants.

Young, J., did.not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Osgood v. Eaton
62 N.H. 512 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A. 138, 69 N.H. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fellows-v-ripley-nh-1898.