Fellows v. President of the Commercial & Rail Road Bank

6 Rob. 246
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 15, 1843·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bullard, J.

This is an action commenced by attachment against the Commercial and Rail Road Bank of Vicksburg, to recover the amount of certain certificates of deposit, amounting to about $6000. The attachment was levied, as it appears, by the Sheriff’s return, upon a debt due by O. B. Cobb, to the defendants, by virtue of several promissory notes held by the defendants against the garnishee, amounting to about thirty-five thousand dollars.

The counsel appointed by the court to represent the absent debtors, after making a motion to dissolve the attachment, which was overruled, answered, that no property or effects belonging to them had been attached ; that the debt formerly due by Cobb to them, was, on the-13th day of February, 1840, transferred, assigned, and delivered, for a valuable consideration to Bodley, Frazier and Robbins, together with all the other property, effects and assets, then belonging to the defendants, for the benefit of their creditors generally, and that no one creditor should have an advantage over others, and that the notes, bills of exchange, &c., due by Cobb were on that day delivered to the said trustees, of which due notice was given to said Cobb, before the institution of this suit. This plea is preceded by a general denial.

The persons above named as trustees, intervened in this suit, except Frazier, who it is alleged was re-placed by Walker, with [248] the consent of all concerned. They set forth the same assignment referred to by the bank, and allege, that it is valid by the laws of Mississippi, and by the charter of the Bank. They refer to copies of the assignment as part of their petition of intervention They allege, that all the notes, other evidences of debt, and property, were transferred and delivered to them, and that they are the legal holders and owners of the same. They further allege, that the debt due by Cobb was at the same time transferred and assigned to them, and that the debtor had notice of the assignment before the inception of this suit. They, therefore, pray to be decreed the true owners and holders of said debt, and that the attachment may be dissolved, and for general relief.

It is admitted of record on the part of the plaintiffs, that the assignment was executed by due authority. That Walker has been substituted for Frazier, as assignee ; that all the effects including all notes, bills, and other evidences of debt, among which were those due by Cobb, were delivered over to the assignees on the day of the assignment; that notice of the assignment was published in two newspapers in Vicksburg, and in two newspapers in New Orleans, for the space of one year after the date of the assignment ;• that the fact of the assignment was publicly spoken of in and about Vicksburg, and the surrounding country; and that Cobb resides twenty-five miles from that place, and was frequently in Vicksburg, in 1840. On the part of the defendants and intervenors, it is admitted, that the certificates of deposit were duly executed by-the proper officers of the Bank. The signatures and official character of Bibby, the Cashier, is admitted ; and that his certificate or statement, without oath, is to be received as evidence of the amount that Cobb owed the Bank, at the time of the assignment, and whether he has paid any part since, or of any thing which he may have done, or proposed in relation to the debt.

The judgment below was for the plaintiffs against the original defendants and the intervenors, and they have appealed.

The principal question which the case presents, and which has been argued in this court is, whether the assignment by the Bank to the intervenors, be valid according to the laws of the State of Mississippi, and whether it has been so notified to the garnishee [249] Cobb, as to place the debt due by him to the Bank, beyond the reach of its creditors, and the plaintiffs’ attachment.

It becomes thus necessary to state the substance of the instrument, in virtue of which, the intervenors claim the property attached, as the assignees of the Bank.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fellows v. President of the Commercial & Rail Road Bank, 6 Rob. 246 (La. 1843).

6 Rob. 246 (Fellows v. President of the Commercial & Rail Road Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bodley v. Goodrich
48 U.S. 276 (Supreme Court, 1849)