Fellows v. High
This text of 7 La. Ann. 451 (Fellows v. High) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A majority of the court is of opinion that the defendants, John and William, Lockett, who are appellants, were not legally cited by the service of the citation on the captain of the bark Acteon, or by the service of the citations on Holmes and Mills. And the said appellants not having made themselves parties to the record, by any appearance in person, or by an authorized attorney, the judgment against them is not valid.
It is therefore adjudged, that the judgment of the district court be reversed, and the plaintiff’s suit be dismissed, with costs in both courts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 La. Ann. 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fellows-v-high-la-1852.