Fellows v. County of Onondaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fellows v. County of Onondaga

2 A.D.3d 1462, 769 N.Y.S.2d 766, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14257

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 A.D.3d 1462 (Fellows v. County of Onondaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fellows v. County of Onondaga, 2 A.D.3d 1462, 769 N.Y.S.2d 766, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Major, J.), entered January 14, 2003, which denied without prejudice the motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff for summary judgment on contractual and common-law indemnification against third-party defendant Robert E. Dye, doing business as Bob Dye Construction.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying without prejudice the motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff, Onondaga County Soil & Water Conservation District (OCSW), seeking summary judgment on contractual and common-law indemnification against third-party defendant Robert E. Dye, doing business as Bob Dye Construction, with leave to renew the motion upon Dye’s completion of additional discovery of present or former employees of OCSW (see generally CPLR 3212 [f]; Pank v Village of Canajoharie, 275 AD2d 508, 509-510 [2000]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Major, J.), entered January 14, 2003, which denied without prejudice the motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff for summary judgment on contractual and common-law indemnification against third-party defendant Robert E. Dye, doing business as Bob Dye Construction.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying without prejudice the motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff, Onondaga County Soil & Water Conservation District (OCSW), seeking summary judgment on contractual and common-law indemnification against third-party defendant Robert E. Dye, doing business as Bob Dye Construction, with leave to renew the motion upon Dye’s completion of additional discovery of present or former employees of OCSW (see generally CPLR 3212 [f]; Pank v Village of Canajoharie, 275 AD2d 508, 509-510 [2000]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 1462, 769 N.Y.S.2d 766, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fellows-v-county-of-onondaga-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack