Fellows v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.

188 F. 863, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 5231
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fellows v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 F. 421

Opinion

WARD, Circuit Judge.

In this cause the defendant presents an order upon the mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals dated June 7, 1911, directing the bill to be dismissed with costs, and at the same time the complainant presents a petition for leave to file a supplemental bill in the nature of a bill of review and a motion for a rehearing, founded upon his disclaimer filed in the Patent ,'ffice June 10, 1911. My duty is to enter a decree dismissing the bill in accordance with the mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals, and I can do nothing else or further. In re Potts, Petitioner, 166 U. S. 263, 17 Sup. Ct. 520, 41 L. Ed. 994; American Soda Fountain Co. v. Sample, 136 Fed. 857, 70 C. C. A. 415.

The complainant may hereafter apply to the Circuit Court of Appeals to authorize this court to entertain this motion, which, because now made' without such permission, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fellows v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co., 188 F. 863, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 5231 (circtsdny 1911).

188 F. 863 (Fellows v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Potts
166 U.S. 263 (Supreme Court, 1897)
American Soda Fountain Co. v. Sample
136 F. 857 (Third Circuit, 1905)