Fellom v. Redevelopment Agency of City and County of San Francisco
358 U.S. 56, 79 S. Ct. 111, 3 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 251
This text of 358 U.S. 56 (Fellom v. Redevelopment Agency of City and County of San Francisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fellom v. Redevelopment Agency of City and County of San Francisco, 358 U.S. 56, 79 S. Ct. 111, 3 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 251 (1958).
Opinion
FELLOM ET AL.
v.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Appellants pro se.
Dion R. Holm and George E. Baglin for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fellom v. Redevelopment Agency
358 U.S. 56 (Supreme Court, 1958)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
358 U.S. 56, 79 S. Ct. 111, 3 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fellom-v-redevelopment-agency-of-city-and-county-of-san-francisco-scotus-1958.