Fellner v. Zuckerberg

202 Misc. 611, 118 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2165
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 19, 1952·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s employment having been terminated without fault on his part, whether the plaintiff is entitled to the return of any part of the fee paid for the conduct of the action to its conclusion, depends on the intention of the parties when the payment was made, to be determined from the receipt and all the surrounding circumstances. These issues should be explored fully.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hoestadter and Schreiber, JJ., concur in Per Curiam memorandum ; Hecht, J., dissents and votes for reversal of the judgment and dismissal of the complaint.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fellner v. Zuckerberg, 202 Misc. 611, 118 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2165 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1952).

202 Misc. 611 (Fellner v. Zuckerberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petition of Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen
600 F. Supp. 527 (S.D. New York, 1984)
Sherrier v. Richard
600 F. Supp. 527 (S.D. New York, 1984)
Jacobson v. Sassower
122 Misc. 2d 863 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Jacobson v. Sassower
113 Misc. 2d 279 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1982)
Reisch & Klar v. Sadofsky
78 A.D.2d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Leibowitz v. Szoverffy
97 Misc. 2d 854 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)
Gross v. Russo
76 Misc. 2d 441 (New York Supreme Court, 1974)