Fellman v. Town of Babylon
225 A.D.2d 517, 639 N.Y.2d 720, 639 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1916
Opinion
The appellant’s contentions regarding certain comments that were made by defense counsel during his summation are, for the most part, unpreserved for appellate review (see, Hoyne v Colletti, 215 AD2d 440). In any event, the challenged comments did not deprive the appellant of a fair trial (see, Hoyne v Colletti, supra).
We have examined the appellant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fellman v. Town of Babylon, 225 A.D.2d 517, 639 N.Y.2d 720, 639 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 517 (Fellman v. Town of Babylon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patrick Hoyne v. Collett
215 A.D.2d 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)