Fellers v. Carson

356 S.E.2d 658, 182 Ga. App. 658, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 1797
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 6, 1987
Docket73628
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 356 S.E.2d 658 (Fellers v. Carson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fellers v. Carson, 356 S.E.2d 658, 182 Ga. App. 658, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 1797 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Benham, Judge.

On February 19, 1984, appellee was bitten by a cat owned by appellants. Appellee received the injury, which became seriously infected, while attempting to remove the cat from her yard. This interlocutory appeal is from the denial of summary judgment to appellants in appellee’s suit against them. We reverse.

This case is controlled by the holding in Brown v. Pierce, 176 Ga. App. 787 (338 SE2d 39) (1985). Here, as there, the defendants put into the record positive evidence that they had no knowledge of the animal ever biting anyone before; the plaintiff had no evidence to the contrary. Under that state of the record, appellants here are entitled to summary judgment just as the appellees in Brown were.

Appellee offers several theories to distinguish this case from cases such as Brown, but we find them unavailing. There is no authority for appellee’s assertion that cat bite cases should be treated differently than dog bite cases. Even if we were inclined to adopt appellee’s public policy arguments against a “first bite” rule, we note, as we did in Smith v. Culver, 172 Ga. App. 183 (322 SE2d 294) (1984), that the Supreme Court has also endorsed the doctrine. Harvey v. Buchanan, 121 Ga. 384 (49 SE 281) (1904). We also note, as we did in Brown, that the ruling in this case may have been different if the injury had occurred after July 1, 1985, the effective date of the 1985 amendment to OCGA § 51-2-7. However, given the circumstances of the case, including its timing, appellants were entitled to summary judgment and the trial court erred in denying it.

Judgment reversed.

Banke, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Mateus
2003 UT 18 (Utah Supreme Court, 2003)
Fields v. Thompson
378 S.E.2d 390 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 S.E.2d 658, 182 Ga. App. 658, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 1797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fellers-v-carson-gactapp-1987.