Feller v. Wright

781 P.2d 1273, 99 Or. App. 379
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Feller v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 103 Or. App. 575
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 8, 1989·No. CV88-718; CA A60277·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff, an inmate at Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, appeals from the dismissal of his claim for habeas corpus relief after the trial court granted defendant’s ORCP 21 A(l) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because “any motion practice other than an ORS 34.680 motion to strike is inappropriate in habeas corpus actions,” the trial court erred in entertaining defendant’s motion to dismiss. Bedell v. Schiedler, 307 Or 562, 566, 770 P2d 909 (1989); Lane v. Maass, 98 Or App 75, 778 P2d 503 (1989).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feller v. Wright, 781 P.2d 1273, 99 Or. App. 379 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

781 P.2d 1273 (Feller v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bedell v. Schiedler
770 P.2d 909 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1989)
Lane v. Maass
778 P.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)