Fella v. State

988 So. 2d 65, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10528, 2008 WL 2695913
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 2008·No. No. 5D08-275·Published

Opinion

PLEUS, J.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Harden v. State, 958 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). Further, as per Harden, the appellant is warned of the consequences which may follow from filing any subsequent pro se petitions related to his conviction and sentence. 958 So.2d at 1156.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fella v. State, 988 So. 2d 65, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10528, 2008 WL 2695913 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

988 So. 2d 65 (Fella v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harden v. State
958 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)