Fella v. State

988 So. 2d 65, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10528, 2008 WL 2695913
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 11, 2008
DocketNo. 5D08-275
StatusPublished

This text of 988 So. 2d 65 (Fella v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fella v. State, 988 So. 2d 65, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10528, 2008 WL 2695913 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

PLEUS, J.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Harden v. State, 958 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). Further, as per Harden, the appellant is warned of the consequences which may follow from filing any subsequent pro se petitions related to his conviction and sentence. 958 So.2d at 1156.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harden v. State
958 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
988 So. 2d 65, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10528, 2008 WL 2695913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fella-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.