Fell v. Lesher

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fell v. Lesher

529 So. 2d 831, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1983, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3740, 1988 WL 86590

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 1988

DocketNo. 87-2469

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 529 So. 2d 831 (Fell v. Lesher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fell v. Lesher, 529 So. 2d 831, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1983, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3740, 1988 WL 86590 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s motion to set aside a default and default judgment for lack of in personam jurisdiction is reversed. See Klukewich v. Howenstine, 522 So.2d 842 (Fla.1988); Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. [832]*832Wright, 522 So.2d 838 (Fla.1988). We reject appellee’s contention that appellant has waived his right to assert lack of jurisdiction due to an unreasonable delay in seeking to set aside the default. See, e.g., Kennedy v. Richmond, 512 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Falkner v. Amerifirst Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 489 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). See also Declaire v. Yohanan, 453 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1984). Nor did appellant’s motion for a stay pending resolution of the jurisdiction issue by the supreme court constitute a waiver. See Cumberland Software, Inc. v. Great American Mortgage Corp., 507 So.2d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Orange Motors of Coral Gables, Inc. v. Rueben H. Donnelley Corp., 415 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We reverse and remand with instructions to enter an order in accordance with this opinion.

DELL, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s motion to set aside a default and default judgment for lack of in personam jurisdiction is reversed. See Klukewich v. Howenstine, 522 So.2d 842 (Fla.1988); Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. [832]*832Wright, 522 So.2d 838 (Fla.1988). We reject appellee’s contention that appellant has waived his right to assert lack of jurisdiction due to an unreasonable delay in seeking to set aside the default. See, e.g., Kennedy v. Richmond, 512 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Falkner v. Amerifirst Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 489 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). See also Declaire v. Yohanan, 453 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1984). Nor did appellant’s motion for a stay pending resolution of the jurisdiction issue by the supreme court constitute a waiver. See Cumberland Software, Inc. v. Great American Mortgage Corp., 507 So.2d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Orange Motors of Coral Gables, Inc. v. Rueben H. Donnelley Corp., 415 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We reverse and remand with instructions to enter an order in accordance with this opinion.

DELL, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

529 So. 2d 831, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1983, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3740, 1988 WL 86590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fell-v-lesher-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack