Felix Villarreal v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 9, 2015
Docket04-15-00715-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Felix Villarreal v. State (Felix Villarreal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felix Villarreal v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00715-CR

Felix VILLARREAL, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR5623 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 9, 2015

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On March 21, 2014, the trial court imposed sentence on Felix Villarreal and certified the

case was a plea-bargain case in which Villarreal had no right of appeal. Villarreal did not file a

motion for new trial. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was therefore April 20, 2014. TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal was not filed until November 5, 2015, and the envelope

in which the notice of appeal was mailed was not postmarked until November 3, 2015.

On November 5, 2015, Villarreal also filed a request in the trial court for permission to file

an out of time appeal because, as he alleges in his motion, he did not knowingly waive his right to 04-15-00715-CR

an appeal. Although we construe Villarreal’s request as a request to file a motion for extension of

time to file the notice of appeal, the request is untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.

Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to

entertain the appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding

that if appeal is not timely perfected, court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address merits

of appeal, and court may take no action other than to dismiss appeal; court may not suspend rules

to alter time for perfecting appeal); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996);

see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs

out-of-time appeals from felony convictions). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of

jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Felix Villarreal v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-villarreal-v-state-texapp-2015.