Felix v. Kings Plaza Dental
This text of 283 A.D.2d 549 (Felix v. Kings Plaza Dental) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated September 13, 2000, which denied their motion to extend the time to file a note of issue.
Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is granted, and it is further,
Ordered that the plaintiffs’ time to file a note of issue and [550]*550certificate of readiness is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to extend the time to file their note of issue. The delay was not extraordinary, and there was no demonstrable prejudice to the defendants (see, CPLR 2004; Kekis v Park Slope Emergency Physician Serv., 244 AD2d 463). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D.2d 549, 725 N.Y.S.2d 220, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-v-kings-plaza-dental-nyappdiv-2001.