Felix v. City of Bloomfield

847 F.3d 1214, 2017 WL 476573, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2283
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided February 6, 2017·No. 14-2149·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the appellant’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc. We also have a response from the appellees. Both the petition and response were circulated to all the active judges of the court who are not disqualified. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a).

Upon consideration, a poll was called, and a majority voted to deny the request for en banc rehearing. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

Chief Judge Tymkovich and Judge Kelly voted to grant en banc rehearing and Judge Kelly has written separately in dissent. Chief Judge Tymkovich joins that dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felix v. City of Bloomfield, 847 F.3d 1214, 2017 WL 476573, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2283 (10th Cir. 2017).

847 F.3d 1214 (Felix v. City of Bloomfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cave v. Thurston
E.D. Arkansas, 2021
New Doe Child 1 v. United States
901 F.3d 1015 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)