Felix v. City of Bloomfield

847 F.3d 1214, 2017 WL 476573, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2283
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 6, 2017
Docket14-2149
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 847 F.3d 1214 (Felix v. City of Bloomfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felix v. City of Bloomfield, 847 F.3d 1214, 2017 WL 476573, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2283 (10th Cir. 2017).

Opinions

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the appellant’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc. We also have a response from the appellees. Both the petition and response were circulated to all the active judges of the court who are not disqualified. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a).

Upon consideration, a poll was called, and a majority voted to deny the request for en banc rehearing. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

Chief Judge Tymkovich and Judge Kelly voted to grant en banc rehearing and Judge Kelly has written separately in dissent. Chief Judge Tymkovich joins that dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cave v. Thurston
E.D. Arkansas, 2021
New Doe Child 1 v. United States
901 F.3d 1015 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 F.3d 1214, 2017 WL 476573, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-v-city-of-bloomfield-ca10-2017.