Felix Sorkin, Individually, General Technologies, Inc., and Precision-Hayes International, Inc. v. P.T. Atlas Manufacturing, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Felix Sorkin, Individually, General Technologies, Inc., and Precision-Hayes International, Inc. v. P.T. Atlas Manufacturing, L.L.C.

DecidedJanuary 19, 2023

Docket05-21-00657-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Felix Sorkin, Individually, General Technologies, Inc., and Precision-Hayes International, Inc. v. P.T. Atlas Manufacturing, L.L.C. (Felix Sorkin, Individually, General Technologies, Inc., and Precision-Hayes International, Inc. v. P.T. Atlas Manufacturing, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Felix Sorkin, Individually, General Technologies, Inc., and Precision-Hayes International, Inc. v. P.T. Atlas Manufacturing, L.L.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

FILE COPY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS -- -- -- --

NO. 22-0278 § FELIX SORKIN, INDIVIDUALLY, § GENERAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Dallas County, § AND PRECISION-HAYES § INTERNATIONAL, INC. 5th District. § v. § P.T. ATLAS MANUFACTURING, L.L.C.

December 16, 2022

Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioners, FELIX SORKIN, INDIVIDUALLY, GENERAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND PRECISION-HAYES INTERNATIONAL, INC., pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 19th day of January, 2023.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILE COPY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS -- -- -- --

NO. 22-0278 § FELIX SORKIN, INDIVIDUALLY, § GENERAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Dallas County, § AND PRECISION-HAYES § INTERNATIONAL, INC. 5th District. § v. § P.T. ATLAS MANUFACTURING, L.L.C.

December 16, 2022

Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioners, FELIX SORKIN, INDIVIDUALLY, GENERAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND PRECISION-HAYES INTERNATIONAL, INC., pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 19th day of January, 2023.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Felix Sorkin, Individually, General Technologies, Inc., and Precision-Hayes International, Inc. v. P.T. Atlas Manufacturing, L.L.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-sorkin-individually-general-technologies-inc-and-precision-hayes-texapp-2023.