Felix Rivera v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 4, 2015
Docket07-15-00400-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Felix Rivera v. State (Felix Rivera v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felix Rivera v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00400-CR

FELIX RIVERA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 391st District Court Tom Green County, Texas Trial Court No. D-12-0821-SB, Honorable Thomas J. Gossett, Presiding

December 4, 2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant, Felix Rivera, attempts to appeal the trial court’s order revoking his

deferred adjudication community supervision, adjudicating him guilty of the offense of

aggravated sexual assault of a child,1 and sentencing him to twenty years’

imprisonment. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was filed untimely, we dismiss for

want of jurisdiction.

1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2015). To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is

imposed or suspended in open court or within ninety days after that date if a motion for

new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Appellant was sentenced in open court

on July 1, 2015, and timely filed a motion for new trial. Therefore, his notice of appeal

was due on September 29, 2015. However, appellant did not file a notice of appeal until

October 2, 2015, and his notice of appeal was not accompanied by a motion for

extension of time to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. By letter dated

October 30, 2015, this Court notified appellant that his notice of appeal appeared to

have been filed untimely and directed him to show, by November 23, 2015, why the

Court has jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond to the Court.

Because appellant’s notice of appeal was filed untimely, this Court is without

jurisdiction over this appeal. See Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2012); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). As such, we

have no authority to take any action other than to dismiss the appeal. See Slaton v.

State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523.

Accordingly, we now dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.2

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

2 Appellant may have recourse by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaro
369 S.W.3d 196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Felix Rivera v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-rivera-v-state-texapp-2015.