Felix Ramirez, Jr. v. State
This text of Felix Ramirez, Jr. v. State (Felix Ramirez, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15, 2018.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-18-00325-CR
FELIX RAMIREZ, JR., Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 185th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 869189
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal of the denial of a motion for the appointment of habeas corpus counsel.
A ruling denying a motion to appoint counsel is an interlocutory order. See e.g. Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (“an order denying appointed counsel under Article 64.01(c) is not an immediately appealable order”). We do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless jurisdiction has been expressly granted by statute. Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). There is no statutory authorization to appeal the denial of a motion to appoint counsel for a habeas corpus.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Wise, and Jewell. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Felix Ramirez, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-ramirez-jr-v-state-texapp-2018.