Felix P. Babauta v. Debra v. Jennings and Ralpahell v. Wilkins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Felix P. Babauta v. Debra v. Jennings and Ralpahell v. Wilkins

DecidedJuly 25, 2017

Docket14-16-00540-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Felix P. Babauta v. Debra v. Jennings and Ralpahell v. Wilkins (Felix P. Babauta v. Debra v. Jennings and Ralpahell v. Wilkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Felix P. Babauta v. Debra v. Jennings and Ralpahell v. Wilkins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order filed July 25, 2017.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-16-00540-CV ____________

FELIX P. BABAUTA, Appellant

V.

DEBRA V. JENNINGS AND RALPAHELL V. WILKINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012-23475

ORDER

On July 6, 2017, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief fails generally to comply with the rules. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h), and (i).

Accordingly, we order appellant’s brief filed July 6, 2017, stricken. Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h), and (i). If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order filed July 25, 2017.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-16-00540-CV ____________

FELIX P. BABAUTA, Appellant

V.

DEBRA V. JENNINGS AND RALPAHELL V. WILKINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012-23475

ORDER

On July 6, 2017, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief fails generally to comply with the rules. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h), and (i).

Accordingly, we order appellant’s brief filed July 6, 2017, stricken. Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h), and (i). If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Felix P. Babauta v. Debra v. Jennings and Ralpahell v. Wilkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-p-babauta-v-debra-v-jennings-and-ralpahell-v-wilkins-texapp-2017.