Felix Hernandez v. State
This text of Felix Hernandez v. State (Felix Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Nos. 04-08-00847-CR & 04-08-00848-CR
Felix HERNANDEZ, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2007CR9885 & 2007CR5616B Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 11, 2009
DISMISSED
The trial court’s certification in each of these appeals states that the case is a “plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has
a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). 04-08-00847-CR & 04-08-00848-CR
Appellant’s counsel has filed written notice with this court that counsel has reviewed the
record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication that
appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that he has the right of
appeal. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s
counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals
are dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Felix Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-hernandez-v-state-texapp-2009.