Felix Glatz Import Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Felix Glatz Import Co. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 588

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 2, 1959

DocketReap. Dec. 9375; Entry Nos. 953252; 947643

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 588 (Felix Glatz Import Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Felix Glatz Import Co. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 588 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official records discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official records discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Cust. Ct. 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-glatz-import-co-v-united-states-cusc-1959.