Felix-Flores v. Holder
This text of 328 F. App'x 487 (Felix-Flores v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Antonio Felix-Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his registry application pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1259. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Manzo-Fontes v. INS, 53 F.3d 280, 282 (9th Cir.1995), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Felix-Flores failed to demonstrate eligibility for registry because the record does not compel the conclusion that Felix-Flores had continuous residency in the United States since January 1, 1972. See 8 U.S.C.. § 1259(a)-(b); Manzo-Fontes, 53 F.3d at 283; see also INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).
Felix-Flores’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-flores-v-holder-ca9-2009.