FELIX DE LA HOZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of FELIX DE LA HOZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (FELIX DE LA HOZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 23, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-966 Lower Tribunal No. F88-21370A ________________
Felix De La Hoz, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Pooler, Judge.
Felix De La Hoz, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 775.082(1), Fla. Stat. (1988) (“A person who has been
convicted of a capital felony shall be punished by life imprisonment and shall
be required to serve no less than 25 years before becoming eligible for parole
. . . .”); State v. Ortiz, 79 So. 3d 177, 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“[B]ecause the
defendant had already served his sentence to completion, the trial court
lacked the authority to set it aside because the question became moot.”);
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(1) (“If the motion is insufficient on its face, and the
time to file a motion under this rule has expired prior to the filing of the motion,
the court shall enter a final appealable order summarily denying the motion
with prejudice.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
FELIX DE LA HOZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-de-la-hoz-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.