Felix De Boisblanc v. Chester A. Usry, District Director of Internal Revenue
This text of 272 F.2d 111 (Felix De Boisblanc v. Chester A. Usry, District Director of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only issue in this case is whether the rebuilding of automobile engines by the taxpayer constituted manufacturing under Section 3403(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3403 (c) requiring imposition of the manufacturer’s excise tax upon the sales of the rebuilt engines. This Court decided the same question adversely to the taxpayer in Hartley v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 252 F.2d 262. See also Hackendorf v. United States, 10 Cir., 1957, 243 F.2d 760, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 826, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 40.
The decision is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 F.2d 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-de-boisblanc-v-chester-a-usry-district-director-of-internal-ca5-1959.