Felix Cordero v. H. Rios

421 F. App'x 670
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 2011
Docket09-17011
StatusUnpublished

This text of 421 F. App'x 670 (Felix Cordero v. H. Rios) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felix Cordero v. H. Rios, 421 F. App'x 670 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Federal prisoner Felix Cordero appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cordero contends that the Bureau of Prisons erred by declining to give him credit toward his federal sentence for the time he served in state custody before he was convicted and sentenced in federal court. The district court properly denied the petition because Cordero is not entitled to credit for time served for a separate state offense. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); see also Taylor v. Reno, 164 F.3d 440, 444-45 (9th Cir.1998); Thomas v. Brewer, 923 F.2d 1361, 1366-67 (9th Cir.1991).

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Ray Thomas v. R.D. Brewer, Warden
923 F.2d 1361 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Taylor v. Reno
164 F.3d 440 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
421 F. App'x 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felix-cordero-v-h-rios-ca9-2011.