Felipe Sixto v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
This text of Felipe Sixto v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (Felipe Sixto v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 21, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-998 Lower Tribunal No. 21-26989-CA-01 ________________
Felipe Sixto, Appellant,
vs.
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles Johnson, Judge.
Giasi Law, P.A., and Melissa A. Giasi (Tampa), for appellant.
Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP and Kathryn L. Ender and Janice Lopez, for appellee.
Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Campbell v. Salman, 384 So. 2d 1331, 1333 (Fla. 3d
DCA 1980) (reversing summary final judgment, holding: “Since the affidavit
was based on information and belief rather than personal knowledge, it was
not admissible into evidence and should not have been considered by the
trial court.”); Thompson v. Citizens Nat. Bank of Leesburg, Fla., 433 So. 2d
32, 32 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (“An affidavit based on information and belief
rather than personal knowledge is not admissible into evidence and should
not be considered by the trial court on a motion for summary judgment.”);
Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(4) (“Affidavits or Declarations. An affidavit or
declaration used to support or oppose a motion must be made on personal
knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that
the affiant or declarant is competent to testify on the matters stated.”); Castle
Key Ins. Co. v. Raymond H. Duke Enters., Inc., 135 So. 3d 578, 580 n.1 (Fla.
1st DCA 2014) (observing that “a trial court may not consider inadmissible
evidence in determining the disposition of a summary judgment motion.”);
see also Custom Design Expo, Inc. v. Synergy Rents, Inc., 327 So. 3d 427
(Fla. 2d DCA 2021) (“hearsay cannot form the basis in an affidavit for
establishing a genuine issue of material fact that would preclude summary
judgment.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Felipe Sixto v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felipe-sixto-v-citizens-property-insurance-corporation-fladistctapp-2026.