Felipe Gomez v. Oscar Stilley

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 22, 2023
Docket04-23-00129-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Felipe Gomez v. Oscar Stilley (Felipe Gomez v. Oscar Stilley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felipe Gomez v. Oscar Stilley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00129-CV

Felipe GOMEZ, Appellant

v.

Oscar STILLEY and Alan Braid, Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CI19940 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 22, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

In 2021, Felipe N. Gomez moved to intervene in the case of Oscar Stilley v. Alan Braid,

M.D., trial court cause number 2021CI19940. On February 15, 2023, Appellant Gomez filed a

notice of appeal. His notice “states his intent to appeal the 2.6.23 refusal of the Trial Court to hear

[Appellant]’s 402.010 Motion, as well as failing to dismiss the case for DWOP otherwise.”

Appellant acknowledges the trial court did not sign an order.

The clerk’s record shows the trial court’s handwritten notes from February 6, 2023, but a

judge’s notes “are not the kind of document[] that constitute a judgment, decision or order from 04-23-00129-CV

which an appeal may be taken.” See Goff v. Tuchscherer, 627 S.W.2d 397, 398–99 (Tex. 1982);

Lares v. Muniz, No. 04-20-00047-CV, 2020 WL 2441423, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May

13, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also In re A.W., 384 S.W.3d 872, 873 (Tex. App.—San Antonio

2012, no pet.) (“[A] judge’s notes are for his or her own convenience and form no part of the

record.”).

On March 1, 2023, we ordered Appellant to show cause in writing by March 13, 2023, why

this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). We

warned Appellant that if he did not timely provide written proof as ordered, we would dismiss this

appeal without further notice. See id. To date, Appellant has not filed a response.

Because the clerk’s record does not contain an appealable order or final judgment, we

dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goff v. Tuchscherer
627 S.W.2d 397 (Texas Supreme Court, 1982)
in the Interest of A.W., Children
384 S.W.3d 872 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Felipe Gomez v. Oscar Stilley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felipe-gomez-v-oscar-stilley-texapp-2023.