Felipe B. v. Yolanda B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Felipe B. v. Yolanda B.

304 A.D.2d 324, 756 N.Y.S.2d 746, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3421

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 304 A.D.2d 324 (Felipe B. v. Yolanda B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Felipe B. v. Yolanda B., 304 A.D.2d 324, 756 N.Y.S.2d 746, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Lesley Friedland, Referee), entered on or about July 13, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the petition for custody of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The evidence adduced, most notably the report of the psychiatric expert noting that respondent mother did not recognize the importance of interaction and communication with the subject child, fairly supported Family Court’s determination that it was in the child’s best interests to place him in petitioner father’s care and custody. Favoring this disposition as well is the circumstance that petitioner will also have custody of the subject child’s two older siblings (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171-173 [1982]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (Lesley Friedland, Referee), entered on or about July 13, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the petition for custody of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The evidence adduced, most notably the report of the psychiatric expert noting that respondent mother did not recognize the importance of interaction and communication with the subject child, fairly supported Family Court’s determination that it was in the child’s best interests to place him in petitioner father’s care and custody. Favoring this disposition as well is the circumstance that petitioner will also have custody of the subject child’s two older siblings (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171-173 [1982]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 324, 756 N.Y.S.2d 746, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felipe-b-v-yolanda-b-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack