Feliciano v. State

2 So. 3d 995, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 17562, 2008 WL 4925749
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Feliciano v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 937 So. 2d 818
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 2008·No. No. 2D07-4154·Published

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

Luis J. Feliciano seeks review of the order denying his motion for postconviction relief, which was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Feliciano raised two claims in his motion. We affirm the denial of claim two without comment. We reverse the denial of claim one based on our finding that Feliciano’s conviction for possession of a firearm while committing a felony violates the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy because his conviction for attempted first-degree murder was enhanced based on the same use of a firearm. See Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145, 1146 (Fla.1991); Mendoza v. State, 941 So.2d 523, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA and SILBERMAN, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feliciano v. State, 2 So. 3d 995, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 17562, 2008 WL 4925749 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

2 So. 3d 995 (Feliciano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mendoza v. State
941 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cleveland v. State
587 So. 2d 1145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)