Feliciano v. Malik

57 A.D.3d 838, 868 N.Y.2d 917

This text of 57 A.D.3d 838 (Feliciano v. Malik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feliciano v. Malik, 57 A.D.3d 838, 868 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

[839]*839The Supreme Court properly found that there are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the appellants’ motion for summary judgment (see CPLR 3212). Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Miller, Dickerson and Eng, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 838, 868 N.Y.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feliciano-v-malik-nyappdiv-2008.