Feliciano v. Guastella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feliciano v. Guastella

98 A.D.3d 434, 949 N.Y.S.2d 629

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 15, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Judgment, [435]*435Supreme Court, Bronx County (John W. Carter, J.), entered on or about August 10, 2012, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs and petitioner’s motion to validate the petition denied.

The designating petition initially filed by petitioner failed to comply with 9 NYCRR 6215.2. Petitioner filed an amended cover sheet that was likewise defective for failure to comply with Election Board rule C.4. Thus, the Board properly determined that both the original designating petition and the attempt to cure the defect were invalid. Concur — Tom, J.P., Freedman, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, [435]*435Supreme Court, Bronx County (John W. Carter, J.), entered on or about August 10, 2012, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs and petitioner’s motion to validate the petition denied.

The designating petition initially filed by petitioner failed to comply with 9 NYCRR 6215.2. Petitioner filed an amended cover sheet that was likewise defective for failure to comply with Election Board rule C.4. Thus, the Board properly determined that both the original designating petition and the attempt to cure the defect were invalid. Concur — Tom, J.P., Freedman, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Feliciano v. Guastella, 98 A.D.3d 434, 949 N.Y.S.2d 629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

98 A.D.3d 434 (Feliciano v. Guastella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related