Feliciano v. Feliciano

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Feliciano v. Feliciano

661 A.2d 96, 234 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 290

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJuly 10, 1995

DocketSC 15295

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 661 A.2d 96 (Feliciano v. Feliciano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feliciano v. Feliciano, 661 A.2d 96, 234 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 290 (Colo. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 856 (AC 12933), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“ 1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by deviating from the child support guidelines by limiting the support for the child to the pro rata share of the AFDC grant applicable to the child?

“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court incorrectly held that entry of a child support order in accordance with the child support guide[916]*916lines would have violated the defendant’s constitutional rights by applying his payments to the state as reimbursement for AFDC payments for two children whom he had no duty to support?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15295. Decided July 10, 1995 Margaret P. Levy, in support of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 856 (AC 12933), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“ 1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by deviating from the child support guidelines by limiting the support for the child to the pro rata share of the AFDC grant applicable to the child?

“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court incorrectly held that entry of a child support order in accordance with the child support guide[916]*916lines would have violated the defendant’s constitutional rights by applying his payments to the state as reimbursement for AFDC payments for two children whom he had no duty to support?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15295. Decided July 10, 1995 Margaret P. Levy, in support of the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

661 A.2d 96, 234 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feliciano-v-feliciano-conn-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack