Felicia v. Wilmington Trust N.A.

181 N.Y.S.3d 503, 2023 NY Slip Op 00609
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 2023
Docket1054 CA 21-01348
StatusPublished

This text of 181 N.Y.S.3d 503 (Felicia v. Wilmington Trust N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felicia v. Wilmington Trust N.A., 181 N.Y.S.3d 503, 2023 NY Slip Op 00609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Felicia v Wilmington Trust N.A. (2023 NY Slip Op 00609)
Felicia v Wilmington Trust N.A.
2023 NY Slip Op 00609
Decided on February 3, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 3, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND OGDEN, JJ.

1054 CA 21-01348

[*1]RAPHAEL FELICIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

WILMINGTON TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLELY TRUSTEE FOR MFRA TRUST 2014-2, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.


RAPHAEL FELICIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered September 17, 2021. The order, inter alia, denied the application of plaintiff for permission to proceed as a poor person.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking, inter alia, damages for "wrongful foreclosure" concerning a judgment of foreclosure entered against her in 2019. She appeals from an order that, inter alia, denied her request for permission to proceed as a poor person under CPLR 1101. In her brief on appeal, however, plaintiff challenges only the judgment of foreclosure and certain orders in the underlying foreclosure action. Inasmuch as plaintiff has not raised any contention with respect to the order on appeal, we dismiss the appeal as abandoned (see Matter of Michael S. [Rebecca S.], 165 AD3d 1633, 1634 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 915 [2019]; see generally Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 984 [4th Dept 1994]).

Entered: February 3, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ciesinski v. Town of Aurora
202 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 N.Y.S.3d 503, 2023 NY Slip Op 00609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felicia-v-wilmington-trust-na-nyappdiv-2023.