Felicia Nicole Jones v. MacY's and Eric Limbocker
Opinion
Opinion issued February 20, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-01018-CV ——————————— FELICIA NICOLE JONES, Appellant V. MACY’S AND ERIC LIMBOCKER, Appellees
On Appeal from the 239th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 74030
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant attempts to appeal from an order dismissing defendants Macy’s
and Eric Limbocker dated October 29, 2013. Although the order states that it is
final and disposes of all claims, causes of actions and parties, the record
demonstrates that the order did not dispose of all claims, causes of action and parties. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)(Whether
a judicial decree is a final, appealable judgment must be determined from its
language and the record in the case.).
Appellant filed a written response but failed to demonstrate that we have
jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Felicia Nicole Jones v. MacY's and Eric Limbocker (Felicia Nicole Jones v. MacY's and Eric Limbocker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.