Felicia Barnett Trevino v. David T. Kulesz, Attorney and Independent of the Estate of Geneva Sue Barnett

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 19, 2019·No. 02-19-00179-CV·Published

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00179-CV

FELICIA BARNETT TREVINO, Appellant V.

DAVID T. KULESZ, ATTORNEY AND INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF GENEVA SUE BARNETT, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-002158-1

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Wallach, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT We have considered appellant’s “First Amended Agreed Motion to Vacate Judgment and Return Supersedeas Bond.” We grant the motion in part and deny in part; therefore, we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court to render judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995). The mandate is ordered issued this date.

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 19, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felicia Barnett Trevino v. David T. Kulesz, Attorney and Independent of the Estate of Geneva Sue Barnett, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Felicia Barnett Trevino v. David T. Kulesz, Attorney and Independent of the Estate of Geneva Sue Barnett (Felicia Barnett Trevino v. David T. Kulesz, Attorney and Independent of the Estate of Geneva Sue Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Innovative Office System, Inc. v. Johnson
911 S.W.2d 387 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)