Felicia Anne Broussard Mulkey v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 4, 2020
Docket10-20-00060-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Felicia Anne Broussard Mulkey v. State (Felicia Anne Broussard Mulkey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felicia Anne Broussard Mulkey v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-20-00057-CR No. 10-20-00058-CR No. 10-20-00059-CR No. 10-20-00060-CR

FELICIA ANNE BROUSSARD MULKEY, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 12th District Court Madison County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-13136, Trial Court No. 18-13060, Trial Court No. 18-13056 and Trial Court No. 18-13134

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 6, 2020, Felicia Anne Broussard Mulkey filed a pro se notice of appeal

of her convictions for continuous sexual abuse of a young child, possession of child

pornography (two convictions), and aggravated sexual assault. Mulkey’s imposition of

sentence in each case was on November 18, 2019, and the judgments of conviction were

each signed the same day. Mulkey’s notice of appeal of each conviction is therefore untimely, and we have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a);

Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where

notice of appeal is untimely). An untimely motion for new trial does not extend the

deadline for filing a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a), 26.2(b); Mendez v. State,

914 S.W.2d 579, 580 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). For the reasons stated, these appeals are

dismissed.

Notwithstanding that we are dismissing these appeals, Mulkey may file a motion

for rehearing with this Court within 15 days after the opinion and judgment in each case

are rendered if she believes the opinion and judgment are erroneously based on

inaccurate information or documents. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Moreover, if Mulkey

desires to have the opinion and judgment of this Court in each case reviewed by filing a

petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal

Appeals within 30 days after either the day this Court’s judgment is rendered or the day

the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a).

REX D. DAVIS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed March 4, 2020 Do not publish [CRPM]

Mulkey v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mendez v. State
914 S.W.2d 579 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Felicia Anne Broussard Mulkey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felicia-anne-broussard-mulkey-v-state-texapp-2020.