Felice Berenson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
This text of Felice Berenson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Felice Berenson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
FELICE BERENSON, Appellant,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 4D14-3985
[April 27, 2016]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Richard L. Oftedal, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2008-CA- 033339 XXXXMB.
Michael Vater and Kendrick Almaguer of The Ticktin Law Group, P.A., Deerfield Beach, for appellant.
Michele L. Stocker and Brandon S. Leon of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. See Grosso v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., No. 4D14-3971 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 27, 2016). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in deeming the Appellant’s post-dismissal motion for costs abandoned where it languished on the docket for fourteen months without a request for hearing or other final resolution by the movant.
Affirmed.
STEVENSON, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Felice Berenson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felice-berenson-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust-company-fladistctapp-2016.