Feldstein v. Bevier

278 A.D. 828, 104 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4913
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 7, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 828 (Feldstein v. Bevier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feldstein v. Bevier, 278 A.D. 828, 104 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

In an action, under article 15 of the Real Property Law, to compel a determination of a claim to real property, order denying in part plaintiff’s motion to strike out defenses and counterclaims from the answer of the defendant-respondent, as sham and insufficient, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order, made on reargument, denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out defenses and counterclaims from the answer of the third-party defendant-respondent as sham, insufficient, and not properly interposed, modified by striking out the second ordering paragraph and inserting in place thereof a paragraph providing that appellant’s motion be granted to the extent of striking from the answer of the third-party defendant the matter designated, “ Second Separate and Complete Defense ”, and the following words [829]*829appearing at folio 190 of the papers on appeal, “and by way of Counterclaim ”. As thus modified, the order, insofar as appeal is properly taken, is affirmed, without costs. Insofar as the appeal is from the portion of the order which grants reargument, the appeal is dismissed, without costs. The second defense in the answer of the third-party defendant, which asserts a six months’ Statute of Limitations as a bar, is not available because the action by the plaintiff against the defendant (third-party plaintiff) was commenced within the six months’ period and the third-party defendant may not assert a defense not available to the defendant (third-party plaintiff). (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193-a, subd. 2.) The counterclaim in the answer of the third-party defendant may not be asserted by that party against the plaintiff where the plaintiff makes no claim against the third-party defendant. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193-a, subd. 3.) Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Carswell, Acting P. J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Concord Factors Corp. v. Lipman
35 Misc. 2d 628 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Well Built Motor Repairs, Inc. v. Utog Federal Credit Union
35 Misc. 2d 622 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Henry Spen & Co. v. Ocean Box Corp.
16 Misc. 2d 436 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Massey Concrete Products Co. v. Powell
4 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Lancer v. Baumrin
2 Misc. 2d 610 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Fitzgerald v. American Surety Co.
3 Misc. 2d 609 (Rochester City Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 828, 104 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldstein-v-bevier-nyappdiv-1951.