Feldon Bonner II v. Saul Austin
Opinion
Opinion issued January 3, 2013
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
NO. 01-09-01059-CV ____________
FELDON BONNER II, Appellant
V.
SAUL AUSTIN AND LINDA MAY AUSTIN, Appellees
On Appeal from the 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007-51857
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Feldon Bonner II, has not filed a clerk’s record. We dismiss the
appeal for want of prosecution. On July 24, 2012, we issued an order stating that appellant had not
established indigence for purposes of appellate costs and directing that appellant
file, within 30 days, written evidence that he had paid, or had made arrangements to
pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1; In re Arroyo,
988 S.W.2d 737, 739 (Tex. 1998). Appellant did not respond and no clerk’s record
has been filed.
On October 10, 2012, we notified appellant that this appeal was subject to
dismissal unless, within 10 days, he filed written proof from the district clerk’s
office that he had paid, or had made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the
clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no
clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary
dismissal). Appellant did not adequately respond.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feldon Bonner II v. Saul Austin (Feldon Bonner II v. Saul Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.