Feldmark v. Weissman

61 Misc. 321, 113 N.Y.S. 761
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 61 Misc. 321 (Feldmark v. Weissman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feldmark v. Weissman, 61 Misc. 321, 113 N.Y.S. 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Ford, J.

This is an appeal from so much of a judgment of dismissal against plaintiff as awards costs to. the defendants and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to modify the judgment by striking from it the provision awarding costs.

The summons as served was made returnable at a date more remote from the date of service than is provided by statute. The defendants appeared specially and procured the dismissal of the action. Judgment was thereupon entered for fifteen dollars costs against the plaintiff who contends that this judgment was unwarranted by law. I agree with him upon the ground that the Municipal Court Act makes no provision for costs under such circumstances.

The judgment should be modified -by striking out the pro[322]*322vision for costs, and, as so modified, affirmed with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.

The appeal from the order should be dismissed without costs.

Giegerich and Hendrick, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Misc. 321, 113 N.Y.S. 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldmark-v-weissman-nyappterm-1908.