Feldman Wood Products Co. v. Geiger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feldman Wood Products Co. v. Geiger

269 A.D.2d 491, 704 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1955

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 491 (Feldman Wood Products Co. v. Geiger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feldman Wood Products Co. v. Geiger, 269 A.D.2d 491, 704 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for fraud and tortious interference with contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated September 22, 1998, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs allegations, even if true, failed to set forth the requisite elements to support viable claims to recover damages for fraud or tortious interference with contract (see generally, Murtha v Yonkers Child Care Assn., 45 NY2d 913, 915; EDP Hosp. Computer Sys. v Bronx-Lebanon Hosp. Ctr., 212 AD2d 570; Strasser v Prudential Sec., 218 AD2d 526, 527; Glenn Partition v Trustees of Columbia Univ., 169 AD2d 488, 489). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for fraud and tortious interference with contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated September 22, 1998, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs allegations, even if true, failed to set forth the requisite elements to support viable claims to recover damages for fraud or tortious interference with contract (see generally, Murtha v Yonkers Child Care Assn., 45 NY2d 913, 915; EDP Hosp. Computer Sys. v Bronx-Lebanon Hosp. Ctr., 212 AD2d 570; Strasser v Prudential Sec., 218 AD2d 526, 527; Glenn Partition v Trustees of Columbia Univ., 169 AD2d 488, 489). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 491, 704 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldman-wood-products-co-v-geiger-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack