Feldman v. United States

Supreme Court

Feldman v. United States

320 U.S. 724, 64 S. Ct. 55

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Feldman v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 322 U.S. 487 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 11, 1943·No. No. 193·Published

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted, limited to the question whether petitioner’s testimony given in the New York supplementary proceedings was properly admitted in evidence at the trial.

Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. tioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Mr. Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted, limited to the question whether petitioner’s testimony given in the New York supplementary proceedings was properly admitted in evidence at the trial.

Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. tioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Mr. Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.

Feldman v. United States, 320 U.S. 724, 64 S. Ct. 55 (1943).

Pincite

320 U.S. 724 (Feldman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.