Feldman v. Polo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feldman v. Polo

256 A.D. 981, 11 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5760

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 981 (Feldman v. Polo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feldman v. Polo, 256 A.D. 981, 11 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting in part appellant’s motion for the examination before trial of the plaintiff, modified by providing that in addition plaintiff submit to examination before trial as to the matters and things set forth in items 1 and 2 of the notice of motion, viz.: (1) That the plaintiff purchased the mortgage set forth in the complaint for the sum of $2,500. (2) The facts and circumstances covering the plaintiff’s negotiations for the purchase of said mortgage and its purchase. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting in part appellant’s motion for the examination before trial of the plaintiff, modified by providing that in addition plaintiff submit to examination before trial as to the matters and things set forth in items 1 and 2 of the notice of motion, viz.: (1) That the plaintiff purchased the mortgage set forth in the complaint for the sum of $2,500. (2) The facts and circumstances covering the plaintiff’s negotiations for the purchase of said mortgage and its purchase. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 981, 11 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldman-v-polo-nyappdiv-1939.