Feldman v. Klosk Bros.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Feldman v. Klosk Bros.

124 Misc. 879, 209 N.Y.S. 764, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 804

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 124 Misc. 879 (Feldman v. Klosk Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feldman v. Klosk Bros., 124 Misc. 879, 209 N.Y.S. 764, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It was prejudicial to the rights of appellant for the trial court to state to the jury after passing upon a request to charge “ You can take your exception and any other - exception you want to. It won’t do you much good.” Because of this, the judgment entered upon the verdict rendered in favor of the respondent must be reversed .and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

It was prejudicial to the rights of appellant for the trial court to state to the jury after passing upon a request to charge “ You can take your exception and any other - exception you want to. It won’t do you much good.” Because of this, the judgment entered upon the verdict rendered in favor of the respondent must be reversed .and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 Misc. 879, 209 N.Y.S. 764, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldman-v-klosk-bros-nyappterm-1925.