Feldman v. Houle

400 So. 2d 180, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20346
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 1981·No. No. 79-2167·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeals the dismissal of his second amended complaint with prejudice. We find the complaint failed to state a [181] cause of action for conspiracy and thus affirm the dismissal. We have considered and reject the granting of leave to amend against the defendant, The Florida Podiatry Association, Inc., on the theories set out in Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical Society, 34 N.J. 582, 170 A.2d 791 (1961); Blende v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 96 Ariz. 240, 393 P.2d 926 (1964); and Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists, 1 Cal.3d 160, 81 Cal.Rptr. 623, 460 P.2d 495 (1969) and 12 Cal.3d 541, 116 Cal.Rptr. 245, 526 P.2d 253 (1974). Plaintiff’s complaint demands damages for past conduct and does not seek admission to the Association.

DOWNEY and BERANEK, JJ., concur. HURLEY, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feldman v. Houle, 400 So. 2d 180, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20346 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

400 So. 2d 180 (Feldman v. Houle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists
460 P.2d 495 (California Supreme Court, 1969)
Blende v. Maricopa County Medical Society
393 P.2d 926 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1964)
Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical Society
170 A.2d 791 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1961)
Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists
526 P.2d 253 (California Supreme Court, 1974)