Feldman v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feldman v. Gold

196 A.D.2d 611, 601 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 18, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 196 A.D.2d 611 (Feldman v. Gold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feldman v. Gold, 196 A.D.2d 611, 601 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Lila Gold as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 14, 1993, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York for Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated August 16, 1993, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioners’ assertions on appeal, the Supreme Court correctly held that the information concerning the subscribing witnesses on the challenged pages of the respondents’ designating petitions substantially complied with the requirements of the Election Law (see, Election Law §§ 6-130, 6-132; see, Matter of Regan v Starkweather, 186 AD2d 980; Matter of Wilson v McClean, 175 AD2d 935, lv denied 78 NY2d 857). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Lila Gold as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 14, 1993, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York for Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated August 16, 1993, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioners’ assertions on appeal, the Supreme Court correctly held that the information concerning the subscribing witnesses on the challenged pages of the respondents’ designating petitions substantially complied with the requirements of the Election Law (see, Election Law §§ 6-130, 6-132; see, Matter of Regan v Starkweather, 186 AD2d 980; Matter of Wilson v McClean, 175 AD2d 935, lv denied 78 NY2d 857). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D.2d 611, 601 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldman-v-gold-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack