Feldman v. Farber
438 So. 2d 202, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24325
This text of 438 So. 2d 202 (Feldman v. Farber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Feldman v. Farber, 438 So. 2d 202, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24325 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
Opinion
Based on appellee’s confession of error, that an injunction is not a proper remedy in an action at law where monetary damages will adequately compensate, Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So.2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Digaeteno v. Perotti, 374 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we reverse and remand.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Digaeteno v. Perotti
374 So. 2d 1015 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Supreme Serv. Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc.
424 So. 2d 844 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
438 So. 2d 202, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feldman-v-farber-fladistctapp-1983.