Feldman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

509 A.2d 639, 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 371

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Feldman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 547 →

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 1986·No. No. 82-1294·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion of petitioner for voluntary dismissal of the petition for review, the responses of the respondent and intervenor thereto, and the further response of petitioner, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the petition for review is dismissed except to the extent that pending motions relating to costs, attorney’s fees, and disbursements are referred for decision to the division which considered this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion of petitioner for voluntary dismissal of the petition for review, the responses of the respondent and intervenor thereto, and the further response of petitioner, it is

Feldman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 509 A.2d 639, 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 371 (D.C. 1986).

Pincite

509 A.2d 639 (Feldman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.