Felder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Felder v. State

67 So. 3d 1177, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12908, 2011 WL 3586118

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 17, 2011

Docket3D11-105

StatusPublished

This text of 67 So. 3d 1177 (Felder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Felder v. State, 67 So. 3d 1177, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12908, 2011 WL 3586118 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

*1178 PER CURIAM.

We treat the defendant, Samuel Curtis Felder’s, Notice of Appeal dated January 4, 2011, as a belated appeal of the trial court’s order dated March 30, 2011 (titled “Order Dismissing Defendant’s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” and “Order Granting the State’s Motion for the Court to Impose Sanctions and to Order the Defendant to Show Cause Why He Should Not Be Prohibited from Filing Further Pro Se Motions”). We hereby dismiss the appeal, as the trial court’s March 30, 2011 order merely granted the State’s motion to show cause why the defendant should not be prohibited from filing further pro se motions. The March 30, 2011 order is thus a non-final, non-appeal-able order. Instead of appealing the March 30 order or filing motions with this Court, the defendant should show cause with the trial court.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*1178 PER CURIAM.

We treat the defendant, Samuel Curtis Felder’s, Notice of Appeal dated January 4, 2011, as a belated appeal of the trial court’s order dated March 30, 2011 (titled “Order Dismissing Defendant’s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” and “Order Granting the State’s Motion for the Court to Impose Sanctions and to Order the Defendant to Show Cause Why He Should Not Be Prohibited from Filing Further Pro Se Motions”). We hereby dismiss the appeal, as the trial court’s March 30, 2011 order merely granted the State’s motion to show cause why the defendant should not be prohibited from filing further pro se motions. The March 30, 2011 order is thus a non-final, non-appeal-able order. Instead of appealing the March 30 order or filing motions with this Court, the defendant should show cause with the trial court.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 So. 3d 1177, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12908, 2011 WL 3586118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felder-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack