Felder v. State

67 So. 3d 1177, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12908, 2011 WL 3586118
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Felder v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10314
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 2011·No. 3D11-105·Published

Opinion

*1178 PER CURIAM.

We treat the defendant, Samuel Curtis Felder’s, Notice of Appeal dated January 4, 2011, as a belated appeal of the trial court’s order dated March 30, 2011 (titled “Order Dismissing Defendant’s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” and “Order Granting the State’s Motion for the Court to Impose Sanctions and to Order the Defendant to Show Cause Why He Should Not Be Prohibited from Filing Further Pro Se Motions”). We hereby dismiss the appeal, as the trial court’s March 30, 2011 order merely granted the State’s motion to show cause why the defendant should not be prohibited from filing further pro se motions. The March 30, 2011 order is thus a non-final, non-appeal-able order. Instead of appealing the March 30 order or filing motions with this Court, the defendant should show cause with the trial court.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felder v. State, 67 So. 3d 1177, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12908, 2011 WL 3586118 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

67 So. 3d 1177 (Felder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunton v. NORTH CARILLON, LLC
67 So. 3d 1177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)