Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Felder v. State

Felder v. State

933 So. 2d 1242, 2006 WL 2000028
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 2006
Docket3D06-1218, 3D06-1084
StatusPublished

This text of 933 So. 2d 1242 (Felder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felder v. State, 933 So. 2d 1242, 2006 WL 2000028 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

933 So.2d 1242 (2006)

Samuel FELDER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 3D06-1218, 3D06-1084.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 19, 2006.

Samuel Felder, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion for post conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and deny his petition for writ of mandamus. See Robinson v. State, 925 So.2d 373 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
925 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
933 So. 2d 1242, 2006 WL 2000028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felder-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.